The Salvation Army of Dane County affords our neighborhood’s only shelter for girls experiencing homelessness. The huge accomplishment of Traister’s ebook is to show that the ranks of girls electing for nontraditional lives—together with queer ladies, single moms, proud spinsters, and women, including Traister herself, who forged their identities alone before marrying relatively late—have also improved the a number of girls who make conventional selections, blowing open the institutions of marriage and parenthood.
Why it’s nice for girls: This big bustling metropolis is probably not wholesome on your pocketbook (rents are among the highest in the nation), but the vast variety of companies catering to women’s beauty needs is virtually three times as many as image-conscious LA; based on a census report from 2002, there are practically 10,000 business focusing on private grooming.
In an early chapter, Traister writes about the historic figures who reshaped women’s relationship to work by defining their lives round causes and inventive passions, not husbands, together with Susan B. Anthony and Mary Cassatt, who never married; as well as Zora Neale Hurston, Frida Kahlo, and Ida B. Wells, who spent long stretches single.
Good news: Single ladies are typically extra cautious spenders than men, since they only splurge on a number of items (the expected ones: clothes and personal care products like shampoo and teeth-whitening products, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics), whereas single guys tear by more cash overall, on issues like eating out, entertainment and automotive possession.
Traister writes, It’s essential to do not forget that, while poverty definitely makes single life more durable, it also makes married life tougher, so much tougher that single life may be preferable.” The guide goes head-to-head with the pundits who treat singlehood, and especially single motherhood, as a form of failure or a scourge on society.